Megyn Kelly is getting dejected in the big leagues and it’s commencement to show.
Aside from what seemed like a blatant squeeze for courtesy and ratings, there was no good reason to palm over NBC’s primetime assembly to Alex Jones, a radical worried swindling idealist who believes the horrific Sandy Hook facile school electrocute is a hoax.
And Kelly did it on Father’s Day, even as still-grieving relatives in Newtown, Conn., pleaded with her not to go with the story.
What an insult.
Sure, she looked tough as she grilled Jones, but Kelly delivered no news. She did not pierce the story of this beast forward, nor yield anything aside from a shoal form of a frightening, sweaty, tin-foil-hat-wearing nutjob.
Yes, it’s newsworthy and frightful that President Trump and his associates compensate courtesy to Jones.
But that’s old news.
NBC News tried to change her report with a show-ending commemorative from Tom Brokaw about hatred debate in America today. He done a lot of sense, but adding him into the telecast to yield gravitas was so blatant.
Kelly’s form of Jones comes just two weeks after she was stymied in an talk with duplicitous Russian personality Vladimir Putin.
Sure it took courage to fly to St. Petersburg and throw questions at the former KGB spymaster. But he walked all over her in that talk and, worse, the Huffington Post suggested on Saturday how she squandered a outrageous cube of her changed time with Putin by rub-down his ego and permitting him to declaim propaganda.
Kelly has argued that it’s critical for her to “shine a light” on Jones, a man whose change grows by the day. And she’s right, we need to be profitable courtesy to him. Here’s the problem: At this point, Kelly just doesn’t have the chops to hoop these monsters.
Maybe one day she will.
In a pre-interview phone review with Jones that he taped and expelled on his website, Kelly described herself to him as a multiple of “Mike Wallace, Oprah Winfrey and Larry the Cable Guy.” She also told him she had no plans to meet with him “and be Barbara Walters.”
Wrong. We indispensable Walters, Diane Sawyer or Ed Bradley for a pursuit like this.
Walters and Wallace could hoop despots like Jones and Putin. Walters, in her prime, could be counted on to go for the jugular, while Wallace was a master of the doubtful followup question. He coaxed his subjects out with near-perfect incredulousness to display their own pomposity and ridiculousness.
She’s positively not Oprah, but maybe Kelly and Larry the Cable Guy have something in common after all: She was once a big star — on cable.
Send a Letter to the Editor Join the Conversation: facebook Tweet